South Waikato 2016 Election special 17 Days to go till close of polls

The twentieth (20) Tokoroa Ward Candidate bielections.

Below is the twentieth Candiates for the Tokoroa ward 150 words of wisdom.

And bielection because the intention was to stand. And here is the platform on which to vote.

Bielections because to stand and win and then stand down sets off a bielection in the first two years. 

With these words would you vote the vision into a seat around the table?

As an elected Councilor if you got this letter in the mail to you as a representative would you be able to champion this dream on the dream wall? 

You have three years. What item of the above pull you focus on?

Remember that at any time a bielections can be called. The district is full of positive people. A vision like this can step in and take the place of any sitting around the table.

Thanks Bern for Sharing this with us.

Any mail today in your box?

Yes this... A question at the Tirau Hall was asked of the person who was the subject of this endorsement about Tirau ward and Putaruru ward dumping Pokie Machines onto Tokoroa Ward. 

The question was not answered. Here are the facts https://youtu.be/IMgUFZ6a0XU video facts.

The question was ask as to who paid for it?

This flier came the same day as the voting papers.

And after reading it it refered to Hillary?

Was the person paying to promote

As it mentioned the USA president Candiates by Name. (No mention of Donald)

Or was it supporting our first female Mayor in South Waikato (two contenders)

No mention of Alan or Jarad either.

A long list however that omitted

-Declined a Community Board for Tokoroa

-Declined a Community Board for Putaruru

-Declined a Community Board for Arapuni

And when the Local Government Commission was called in...

-Declined a Community Board for Tokoroa again

-Declined a Community Board for Putaruru again

-Declined a Community Board for Arapuni again 

The South Waikato has to wait now six years (not five Alan as said in Tirau Hall) for the imposed representation review to come around in 2012.

But in 2013 the council declined again when 750 people signed to force council to have a representation review. Council told the Local Government Commission that the 5% of the community wanting a representation review was not valid. But 4 months earlier Council refused to hold a proper consultation with the community and then laughed at the community when it was a few short of 5% demanding council hold a representation review.

You decide as councillors and community how you would have voted. Or will vote to the following information?

https://youtu.be/ntCHGYrrZ4o

This same council who told the Local government commission the following about our community.

Go in 21.00 minutes and see the Mayor and Deputy mayor and CEO and staff present this to the Newly Appointed Local Givernment Commission https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByH8M07uCuiHMk9TaGhVcU05Rkk (part two of two)

 

What standing does this endorsement have if this is the premise that the endorser stands upon?

Ref

Local Government Commission hearing of an appeal of the representation review of the South Waikato District Council 

Part one of two https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByH8M07uCuiHNXQybFNvN2J3YjA